Legal Opinion
Ansley v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided April 14, 1943No. 10339PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLMES, Circuit Judge.
These appellants were convicted of conspiring to violate the internal revenue laws relating to intoxicating liquor. They seek to reverse the judgment upon the grounds that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the verdict, and that prejudicial procedural errors were committed in the course of the trial.'
The record discloses that these appellants moved for a directed verdict at the close of the Government’s case, but thereafter they introduced evidence in their own behalf, and failed to renew their motion at the close of all the evidence. The failure to renew operated…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Goldberg v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1924
- Cox v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
- Lambert v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939
- McAdams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
- Jordan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Carlisle v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Odell Clark v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
- United States v. Robert Dibernardo and Theodore RothsteinCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- Lima Lynn Kivette and Dow Kivette v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
- C. G. Benham v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.