Legal Opinion

United States v. Robert Dibernardo and Theodore Rothstein

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided August 21, 1989No. 87-5387PublishedCited by 78 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VINSON, District Judge:

This is the fourth occasion that this Court has considered an appeal involving this case. Since Robert DiBernardo and Theodore Rothstein were tried, convicted, and sentenced in 1981, the case has expanded and grown like kudzu to encompass numerous collateral issues. The issue now before us is simply whether the trial court properly granted these two defendants a new trial. The government contends that the district court abused its discretion in considering the motion for new trial, and that, even if the court could consider the motion, it did not have jurisdiction to…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Hensley v. Municipal Court, San Jose-Milpitas Judicial Dist., Santa Clara Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by78 opinions

  1. United States v. BrowneCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
  2. Commonwealth v. PadillasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  3. State v. BrightSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2000
  4. United States v. W.J. PostonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
  5. United States v. Lealon MuldrowCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API