Legal Opinion

In Re H & M Parmely Farms

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Dakota

Decided December 13, 1989No. 19-30001PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IRVIN N. HOYT, Chief Judge.

James E. Carlon, counsel for the debtors, has filed a motion to enforce the provisions of the debtors’ final amended consolidated Chapter 11 plan of reorganization which was confirmed by the Court 1 on September 30, 1985. Creditor Farmers Home Administration objects to debtors’ motion, claiming that their action is an attempt to “cash out” FmHA and defeat its election under 11 U.S.C. § 1111(b).

Harold and Merlyn Parmely filed for bankruptcy under Chapter 11 on June 26, 1984. Their cases were consolidated on October 10, 1984 and a Chapter 11 plan of reorganization was…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Stoll v. GottliebSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Farmers Elevator Co. of Elk Point v. LyleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Kane v. SchnitzlerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Willadsen v. CrawfordSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1953
  5. In Re Waterways Barge PartnershipUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re CookUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Dakota · 1991
  2. AMT CADC Venture, LLC v. Town Centers Development Co. (In re Town Centers Development Co.)District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API