Legal Opinion

Willadsen v. Crawford

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 4, 1953No. File 9378PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRudolph, J.

Plaintiff seeks to enjoin the defendant Crawford from maintaining a dam across the Vermillion river. The dam is located on land owned by defendant. The City of Parker, Lions Club of Parker and James H. Schaeffer have intervened. Intervenors take the position that the injunction should not issue. The trial court entered judgment in favor of the plaintiff. The defendant and intervenors, Lions Club and Schaeffer, have appealed. Facts are as follows:

Plaintiff owns land south of land owned by the defendant. The Vermillion river flows north through the land of the parties. In 1934 by means of a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hawes v. OaklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Dimpfell v. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Pixley v. . ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
  4. Healey v. Citizens Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1924
  5. Babcock v. McKeeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1945

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. L.R. Foy Construction Co. v. South Dakota State Cement Plant CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  2. City of Huron v. JelgerhuisSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Jandreau v. Sheesley Plumbing & Heating Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Sander v. WrightSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Matter of Estate of WilliamsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API