Parker v. Crete Carrier Corp.
District Court, E.D. Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
COFFMAN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court upon the motion of the plaintiffs to remand [Record No. 3] and motion of the defendant, Crete Carrier Corporation (“Crete”), to consolidate. [Record No. 5].
The defendant, Crete, moves the Court to consolidate this action with Lois R. Morris et al. v. Crete Carrier Corporation et al., London Civil Action No. 94-174. The Court granted Crete’s motion for summary judgment in London Civil Action 94-174, leaving no remaining issues. Therefore, Crete’s motion to consolidate is moot. The only issue before the Court is the plaintiffs’ motion…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Strawbridge v. CurtissSupreme Court of the United States · 1806
- Averdick v. Republic Financial Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1992
- State of Louisiana v. Sprint Communications Co.District Court, M.D. Louisiana · 1995
- Jewell v. Dudley L. Moore Ins., Inc.District Court, M.D. Louisiana · 1995
- Ware v. Jolly Roger Rides, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1994
3Cited by15 opinions
- Ahearn v. Charter Township of BloomfieldCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Combs v. ICG Hazard, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2013
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Dow Chemical Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1999
- Finley v. Higbee Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1997
- Friederichs v. GorzDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.