Legal Opinion

State v. Broughton

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 2, 1923No. 23,147PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.

Defendant was convicted of the crime of carnal knowledge of a female under the age of 18 years. He appeals from the order denying his motion for a new trial.

The defendant, a steam shovel engineer, was working with a state highway crew at Montgomery. The offense is claimed to have occurred in a tent which the defendant and another had near the work. The case presents the usual direct affirmation by the girl which is met by the usual direct denial of the defendant. There are circumstances tending to support the story of the girl and others tending to support the testimony of the defendant. The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. PeirceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  2. State v. McReadySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. SchifskySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  2. State v. SoltauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  3. State v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  4. State v. Kraus, Jr.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  5. Moran v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1948

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API