State v. Nelson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Julius J. Olson, Justice.
Defendant appeals from an order denying Ms motion for a new trial and from the judgment convicting him of the crime of sodomy.
The information charged that defendant, at a stated time arid place, “did wilfully, unlawfully, and feloniously carnally know a male person, to-wit: [naming individual] by and with the mouth, against the form of the statute,” etc. That the evidence abundantly establishes defendant’s commission of the crime charged in the information cannot be doubted by anyone who will take the time to read the record. Rather and only, we think, the question is…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Johnson v. SampsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Lanz v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1869
- State v. GrearSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
- State v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- State v. HoldenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Pruett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1970
- State v. SchmitSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- State v. TennysonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
- State v. SchabertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.