Legal Opinion

State v. McReady

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 26, 1923No. 23,268PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Taylor, C.

The defendant was convicted raf the crime of taking indecent liberties with a female child under the age of seven years, and appeals from an order denying a new trial.

Defendant contends that the verdict is not justified by the evidence. To rehearse the evidence would serve no useful purpose. If the story of the child be true, defendant took indecent liberties *367with her. There is strong corroborating testimony. Defendant denied all the acts charged. The question was for the jury.

Defendant also contends that the evidence fails to show that the offense was committed in Anoka county. We…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. LentzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  2. Hurlburt v. LeachmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  3. Brown v. Duluth, South Shore & Atlantic Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  4. Edwards v. MurrayWyoming Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Leach v. WilburMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1864

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. SchifskySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  2. State v. Kraus, Jr.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  3. State v. TrezonaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  4. State v. BroughtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  5. State v. LarsenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API