Quint v. O'Connell
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Action to recover for merchandise alleged to have been sold to the defendant, brought to the Court of Common Pleas in New London County and tried to the jury before Waller, J.; verdict and judgment for the plaintiff for $130, and appeal by the defendant.
1Opinion of the CourtKoraback, J.
The following facts were undisputed upon the trial: In the months of December, 1913, and January, 1914, one Stanley Leno, who was known as St. Leno, was in a saloon owned by the defendant in Norwich, Connecticut, as the defendant’s agent with authority to sell liquors in this saloon. . There was no evidence that Leno had express authority to buy supplies for this place on the defendant’s credit. Upon two occasions during the months of December, 1913, and January, 1914, the agent for the plaintiff called at the defendant’s saloon for the purpose of selling liquors. When the plaintiff’s agent…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Benjamin v. BenjaminSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1843
- Thames Steamboat Co. v. Housatonic RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1855
- Kearns v. NickseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1907
- Union Trust Co. v. McKeonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1904
3Cited by32 opinions
- Tomlinson v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Lettieri v. American Savings BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Ackerman v. Sobol Family Partnership, LLPSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Hollywyle Assn., Inc. v. HollisterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Lewis v. Michigan Millers Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.