Legal Opinion

Vest v. Schafer

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1988No. S-2091PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MOORE, Justice.

I

This case is before us for the second time. For many years, the State’s Longevity Bonus Program paid monthly benefits to twenty-five year Alaska residents, age 65 or over, who had been domiciled in Alaska before statehood. AS 47.45.010-170 (prior to amendment in 1984). In 1984, this court held that the twenty-five year residency requirement and the pre-statehood domicile requirement violated the equal protection clause of the federal Constitution. Schafer v. Vest, 680 P.2d 1169, 1170-71 (Alaska 1984) (hereafter “Schafer I”). 1 The superior court issued injunctive and…

2Cases cited60 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Departments of Transportation & Labor v. Enserch Alaska Construction, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Johnson v. Alaska State Department of Fish & GameAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Lowell v. HayesAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Owsichek v. State, Guide Licensing & Control BoardAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Beard v. BaumAlaska Supreme Court · 1990

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API