State v. McClure
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1DissentSercombe, J.
The legislative history of a statute can be used to “assist a court in its construction of a statute” under ORS 174.020(l)(b). That history, however, cannot be used to change *210the plain meaning of a statute. See State v. Gaines, 346 Or 160, 173, 206 P3d 1042 (2009) (“When the text of a statute is truly capable of having only one meaning, no weight can be given to legislative history that suggests — or even confirms — that legislators intended something different.”); see also Suchi v. SAIF, 238 Or App 48, 55, 241 P3d 1174 (2010), rev den, 350 Or 231 (2011) (“Even assuming that the legislative…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- Lane County v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1997
- Force v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 2011
- Suchi v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- State v. BoldenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.