Legal Opinion

State v. Bolden

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 21, 1990No. DA 390926; CA A62092PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for resisting arrest, 1 former ORS 162.315, contending that the trial court erred in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal. The single issue presented is whether “resisting arrest” may include resistance that occurs while an officer is bringing a defendant in for booking, or whether an arrest is such a discrete event that the resistance must occur at the precise moment one is placed “under arrest.” We conclude that the statute may encompass both kinds of resistance, and we affirm.

Responding to a report of a disturbance, Portland police officer Whisler…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. SwansonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. BayOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. State v. PierceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  3. Growing Green Panda v. Dept. of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  4. State v. LindseySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
  5. State v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API