Legal Opinion

Suchi v. SAIF Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 20, 2010No. 0702227; A139089PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

At issue in this workers’ compensation case is whether claimant’s award of permanent partial disability should include awards for both impairment and “work disability.” Employer awarded only impairment because the relevant statute provides that, when a worker’s employment “is terminated for cause unrelated to the injury,” ORS 656.726(4)(i)(E)(iii), 1 that is the only factor to be considered and, in this case, claimant was laid off for reasons unrelated to his injury. The Workers’ Compensation Board agreed. Claimant now seeks review, arguing that the board erred because the statutory reference…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. GuzekOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. StamperCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  4. Lane County v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. StamperOregon Supreme Court · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. HarperCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  2. Harper v. Mt. Hood Community CollegeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  3. State v. ShifflettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  4. State v. BilbaoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
  5. Oakleigh-McClure Neighbors v. City of EugeneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API