Legal Opinion

Madsen v. Murrey & Sons Co., Inc.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1987No. 19977PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWE, Justice:

Appellant Murrey & Sons Company, Inc. (seller), seeks reversal of the trial court’s judgment ordering it to return $21,250 to respondent Erik H. Madsen (buyer) in partial restitution of $42,500 paid by him on a contract between the parties which the buyer subsequently breached. Utah Code Ann. § 70A-2-718(2), (3) (1980).

Seller is a corporation located in Los Angeles, California, and engaged in the business of manufacturing and selling pool tables. In early 1978, buyer, a resident of Salt Lake City, Utah, was working on an idea to develop a pool table which, through the use of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Timber Access Industries Co. v. U. S. Plywood-Champion Papers, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Utah Farm Production Credit Ass'n v. CoxUtah Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Mabey v. Kay Peterson Construction Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Detroit Power Screwdriver v. LadneyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. Anchorage Centennial Development Co. v. Van Wormer & Rodrigues, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Gibbs M. Smith, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Covey v. CoveyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2003
  3. Ahhmigo v. SynergyUtah Supreme Court · 2022
  4. Purina Mills, L.L.C. v. LessDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2003
  5. In Re Mirant Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API