Legal Opinion
Davis v. Cook
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided November 20, 1922PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL.
Hart, j.
The two cases embraced in this appeal were consolidated for the purpose of trial in the court below and were heard together. From, a decree dismissing their complaint for want of equity, appellants have prosecuted an appeal to this court.
Appellees moved to dismiss the appeal on the ground that it was not brought within the time prescribed by the statute.
The Legislature of 1919 passed a special act' to organize Road Improvement District No. 7 of Little River County. See Road Acts of Arkansas 1919, vol. 1, p. 1205.
Appellants are owners of real property within…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Road Improvement Districts 1, 2 & 3 v. CrarySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. LangleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
- Ferrell v. MassieSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
3Cited by5 opinions
- Robbins-Sanford Mercantile Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
- Davis v. CookSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
- McIlroy v. BairdSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
- Plum Bayou Levee District v. Pocket Cypress Drainage District No. 1Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
- Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Manson-O'Kean Road Improvement DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923