Poggi v. City of New York
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Justice Sullivan. We note that we do not reach the question whether the variable supplements funds constitute a pension or retirement benefit. That question is unnecessary to the determination of the issues before us: whether plaintiffs’ pension contract rights or their equal protection rights have been impaired. (See also, Matter of Lippman v Board of Educ., 66 NY2d 313.)
Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Meyer, Simons, Kaye, Titone and Hancock, Jr.,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Lippman v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
3Cited by19 opinions
- Ballentine v. KochNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Municipality of Anchorage v. GallionAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
- DeLuca v. DeLucaNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
- Kastel v. Winnetka Bd. of Educ., Dist. 36District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
- Crown v. Trustees of the Patrolmen's Variable Supplements FundDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.