Legal Opinion
Crown v. Trustees of the Patrolmen's Variable Supplements Fund
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 15, 1987No. 85 Civ. 2673 (SWK)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KRAM, District Judge.
This action is brought under the Civil Rights Act of 1871, 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiffs, retired superior officers or patrolmen of the New York City Police Department, 1 allege that defendants, the Trustees of the Patrolmen’s and the Police Superior Officers’ Variable Supplements Funds (the “Trustees”) and the City of New York (the “City”), acting under color of state law, denied plaintiffs their variable supplement payments, which deprived them of property without due process, in violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Goss v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division v. CraftSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Board of Trustees of the Employees' Retirement System v. Mayor of Baltimore CityCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
- State ex rel. Horvath v. State Teachers Retirement BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Graboski v. GuilianiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Castellano v. Board of Trustees of the Police Officers' Variable Supplements FundCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- State ex rel. Horvath v. State Teachers Retirement Bd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.