Legal Opinion

Franklin, Weinrib, Rudell & Vassallo, P. C. v. Stellato

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 19, 1997PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Eileen Bransten, J.), entered November 22, 1996, which, in an action by plaintiff law firm to recover a legal fee in which defendant client has interposed a counterclaim for legal malpractice, denied plaintiff’s motion to strike defendant’s answer for failure to respond to plaintiff’s demand for a bill of particulars and granted defendant’s cross motion to vacate the demand for a bill of particulars and to compel plaintiff to produce documents requested in defendant’s notice of discovery and inspection, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Concerning…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Posh Pillows, Ltd. v. HawesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  2. Helfant v. RappoportAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
  3. Rosenberg & Estis, P. C. v. StewartCivil Court of the City of New York · 1987

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Saratoga Harness Racing, Inc. v. RoemerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. Securities & Exchange Commission v. RyanDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2010
  3. Rosenberg Feldman Smith, LLP v. Ninety-Five Madison Co., L.P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API