Legal Opinion

Rosenberg & Estis, P. C. v. Stewart

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided December 15, 1987PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Seymour Schwartz, J.

In this action for attorneys’ fees, plaintiff moves for a protective order with respect to defendant’s demand for discovery and inspection of all of plaintiff’s files relating to defendant, its former client. Defendant interposed a counterclaim alleging malpractice and contends that plaintiff’s files are essential to her prosecution of the counterclaim. Plaintiff argues that compliance with the demand for discovery and inspection would effectively nullify its retaining lien on the files.

The retaining lien is analogous to the artisan’s or mechanic’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rosen v. RosenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  2. Goldman v. Rafel Estates, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
  3. Williams v. Hertz Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  4. Mercantini v. InnamoratiNew York Supreme Court · 1960

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Franklin, Weinrib, Rudell & Vassallo, P. C. v. StellatoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API