Legal Opinion
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Ryan
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided October 20, 2010No. 8:10-mj-00513PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER
RANDOLPH F. TREECE, United States Magistrate Judge.
On May 3, 2010, the Securities and Exchange Commission (hereinafter “SEC”) filed a Complaint against Matthew John Ryan (hereinafter “Ryan”) and Prime Rate and Return, LLC (hereinafter “Prime Rate”), seeking to stop an alleged ongoing fraud purportedly being perpetrated by these Defendants upon senior citizens who were seeking fixed income investments. Dkt. No. 1, Compl. Concurrent with filing the Complaint, the SEC filed a Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order, Dkt. No. 5, which resulted in the Honorable Norman…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Andresen v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Grosso v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. WeintraubSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. ForsterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- AT&T Mobility Holdings B.V. v. Grupo Salinas Telecom, S.A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025
- Dynamic Systems, Inc. v. Skanska USA Building, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2023
- Huzhou Chuangtai Rongyuan Investment Management Partnership v. QinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2023
- Hybrid Athletics, LLC v. Hylete, LLCDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2019
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.