Legal Opinion

Marks v. Knofsky Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 11, 1924No. Gen. No. 28,491PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thomson

By this appeal, the Massachusetts Bonding and Insurance Company seeks to reverse a judgment for $833.08, recovered against it in the municipal court of Chicago, by Isaac Marks and Benjamin Marks, doing business as Henry Marks ’ Sons. The Insurance Company was held liable on a recognizance entered into by it and the original defendant, The Knofsky Company, the latter being the principal in the recognizance.

The original suit was started as “Henry Marks and Benjamin Marks, co-partners, doing business as Henry Marks’ Sons v. The Knofsky Company,” to recover the price of certain materials the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Chicago City Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Christal v. . KellyNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  3. Gunsul v. American Surety Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Sharpe v. W. J. Morgan & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Salomon v. BuehlerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1906

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McGowan v. London & Lancashire Indemnity Co. of AmericaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1925
  2. Bright v. RiedyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1927
  3. Kesner v. FarollAppellate Court of Illinois · 1932
  4. Parisian Novelty Co. v. Advertisers Manufacturing Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API