Kesner v. Faroll
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Matchett
In an action in trover for the conversion of certain stocks defendants pleaded the general issue. On trial by jury there Avas a verdict for plaintiff, on Avhich after motions for a new trial and in arrest and for judgment non obstante veredicto had been overruled, judgment was entered for plaintiff in the sum of $24,535.13. From that judgment defendants have perfected this appeal.
At the close of plaintiff’s eAddence and again at the close of all the evidence, defendants made a motion for a directed verdict in their favor, which was denied, and the principal (and Ave think the controlling)…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Cochran & Sayre v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Richardson v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Markham v. . JaudonNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
- London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. HornIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
- Schonwald v. RagainsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- M. Shapiro & Son Construction Co. v. BattagliaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Hines v. Ward Baking Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1946
- City Nat. Bank of Murphysboro v. ReimanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
- Dee v. Bank of Oakbrook TerraceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980