Legal Opinion
Faris v. Potomac Electric Power Co.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 7, 1991No. Civ. A. 90-0573 (CRR)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
CHARLES R. RICHEY, District Judge.
Proceeding pro se, the plaintiff in the above-captioned ease is suing the Potomac Electric Power Company (“PEPCO”) for $50,000 in damages caused by a fire allegedly started due to the defendant’s wrongdoing and for $100,000 for the plaintiffs allegedly “traumatic” nine-year-long relationship with the defendant. The defendant has filed a motion for summary judgment, which the Court shall grant because there is no genuine issue of material fact and the defendant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.
Before proceeding to discuss the fire…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- District of Columbia v. FreemanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Cramer v. Housing Opportunities CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- District of Columbia v. CassidyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Vann v. WillieCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
3Cited by5 opinions
- Sumpter v. City of MoultonCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1994
- Kuns v. City of UkiahCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Sumpter v. City of MoultonCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1994
- Von Der Heide v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Von Der Heide v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998