Legal Opinion

State v. Cooney

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 30, 1899No. Nos. 11,728—(18)PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Action of replevin in the district court for Becker county. Julia Selkirk intervened, and from an order, Baxter, J., overruling a demurrer to her complaint, plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtCanty, J.

This is an action of replevin for the meat of 14 deer. The action is brought in the name of the state, by authority of the board of game and fish commissioners, under the claim that such meat was in the possession of the defendant five days after the close of the open season, contrary to Laws 1897, c. 221, § 14.

Julia Selkirk intervened, and in her complaint of intervention alleges that at the time of the seizure of the game under the writ of replevin herein, such game was on the White Earth Indian reservation, in this state, and she was in the possession of the same and the owner thereof;…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Worcester v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  2. Cherokee Nation v. State of GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1831
  3. United States v. HollidaySupreme Court of the United States · 1866
  4. Selkirk v. StephensSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  5. United States v. BoydCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1897

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Organized Village of Kake v. EganSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Pioneer Packing Co. v. WinslowWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  3. State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  4. Cohen v. GouldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  5. Sigana v. BaileySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API