Legal Opinion

Selkirk v. Stephens

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 23, 1898No. Nos. 11,003-(130)PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Becker county, Searle, J., sustaining a demurrer to the complaint.

1Opinion of the Court

START, O. J.

The material facts alleged in the complaint are: The plaintiff is an Indian, and an actual inhabitant of White Earth Indian reservation, situated within the limits of this state, and a trader thereon under a license from the United States. Prior to November 19, 1896, as such trader, she purchased upon the reservation, from Indians residing thereon who were members of the tribes located thereon, a quantity of game birds which were killed thereon by such Indians, consisting of prairie chickens and partridges, of the value of $485. On the day named the plaintiff attempted to ship the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Geer v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. State v. CampbellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  3. State v. Northern Pacific Express Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1894

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Pioneer Packing Co. v. WinslowWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Cohen v. GouldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  3. Bem-Way-Bin-Ness v. EshelbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
  4. State v. CooneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
  5. State v. CarsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API