Legal Opinion

Hilb, Rogal & Hamilton Co. v. BEIERSDOERFER

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 25, 2009No. 1071395 and 1071396PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Justice.

Hilb, Rogal & Hamilton Company, Hilb, Rogal & Hamilton of Alabama, Inc., and BDF-Meadows, Inc. (collectively referred to as “the HRH corporations”), appeal from the trial court’s order remitting the damages awarded to Werner Beiersdoer-fer and against the HRH corporations. Beiersdoerfer cross-appeals from that same order. We reverse and remand.

Facts and Procedural History

This is the third time this case has been before this Court. See Beiersdoerfer v. Hilb, Rogal & Hamilton Co., 953 So.2d 1196 (Ala.2006) (“Beiersdoerfer I”); Hilb, Rogal & Hamilton Co. v. Beiersdoerfer, 989…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Blunt v. LittleU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1822
  2. Holcombe v. WhitakerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
  3. Beiersdoerfer v. HILB, ROGAL AND HAMILTONSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  4. W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. HannonAlabama Court of Appeals · 1945
  5. Hilb, Rogal & Hamilton Co. v. BeiersdoerferSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. BEIERSDOERFER v. Hilb, Rogal & Hamilton Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API