Legal Opinion

Runyon v. City of Neosho Rapids

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided November 3, 1978No. 49,129PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Foth, C.J.:

This is an appeal by the defendants, the City of Neosho Rapids and its governing body, from an order in mandamus requiring an audit of the city’s books and an order allowing attorney fees to the plaintiffs.

On January 12, 1976, plaintiffs, electors of the city, filed a petition with the governing body requesting an audit of the city’s finances for the preceding six year period. Neosho Rapids being a city of the third class a regular annual audit is not required by statute, but the city is governed by K.S.A. 75-1125 (Weeks 1969), and particularly the relevant proviso;

*620“Provided, That…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Barten v. Turkey Creek Watershed Joint District No. 32Supreme Court of Kansas · 1968
  2. Morrison v. Hurst Drilling Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  3. Bodle v. BalchSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  4. Baker v. BakerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hardesty v. Coastal Mart, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API