Legal Opinion

Hardesty v. Coastal Mart, Inc.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 19, 1996No. 71,560PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Six, J.:

This case reviews district court discretion in the context of party stipulations in a pretrial order. The focus is on admissibility *646of medical records of six previous falls as evidence of habit in a trip and fall personal injury case. The plaintiff, Gloria Hardesty, was injured in a fall after purchasing gasoline at a station owned by defendant, Coastal Mart, Inc. (Coastal). The jury assessed 90% fault against Coastal and 10% against Hardesty. Hardesty was awarded damages of $177,712.48, including $150,000 for pain and suffering. Coastal…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Joel Reyes v. Missouri Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  2. Perrin v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
  3. John F. Loughan v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Company, John F. Loughan, Cross-Appellee v. Firestone Tire and Rubber Company, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
  4. State v. GonzalesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1989
  5. Pope v. RansdellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Connelly v. Kansas Highway PatrolSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
  2. State v. PriceSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
  3. – State v. Lyman –Supreme Court of Kansas · 2020
  4. In re GambleSupreme Court of Kansas · 2024
  5. Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API