Lindh v. Crowley
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Saline District Court. At the August and November Terms, 1880, of the district court, defendant Crowley obtained certain orders and judgments against plaintiff Lindh, who brings them here for review. The opinion states the facts.
1Opinion of the Court
*48The opinion of the court was delivered by
Horton, C. J.:
On the 14th day of July, 1879, plaintiff in error filed three separate bills of particulars with E. L. Norton, a justice of the peace in Saline county, against Charles F. Freeman and Mary Crowley, partners as Freeman & Co. In the one action he demanded judgment upon a promissory note dated September 18, 1878, executed by Freeman & Co. for $260, with interest' at ten per cent, per annum. In another action he demanded judgment against the same defendants upon a promissory note executed November 15, 1878, for $270, with interest at the rate…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Burnes v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
- Brenner v. EglySupreme Court of Kansas · 1879
3Cited by5 opinions
- Marshall v. Saline River Land & Mineral Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1907
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Railroad v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893
- Lindh v. CrowleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
- Groat v. PrachtSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
- Hentig v. Southwestern Mutual Benevolent Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891