Lindh v. Crowley
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Saline Distriot Court. The plaintiff Lindh brings the case to this court, and •assigns as error the order made at the May Term, 1882, of the district court, granting the defendant Qrowley a new trial. The facts sufficiently appear in Lindh v. Crowley, 26 Kas. 47, et seq., and in the opinion herein.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Valentine, J.:
This is the second time that this ease has been to this court. (Lindh v. Crowley, 26 Kas. 47.) After its return to the district court, the plaintiff so amended his petition as to make the action an action by P. E. Lindh as plaintiff, against J. W. Crowley alone, as the defendant. The action is founded upon three promissory notes, for $260, $270 and $280, respectively, with interest, each signed “Freeman & Co.,” and a due-bill for $150, also signed “Freeman & Co.”' It is admitted by the parties that there was a partnership, consisting of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Field v. KinnearSupreme Court of Kansas · 1869
- Whitaker v. BrownCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1836
- Deitz v. RegnierSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
- Carrier v. CameronMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
- Ferrie v. Public AdministratorNew York Surrogate's Court · 1855
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Ferguson v. Kansas City Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1945
- Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Fralick v. Kansas City Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1949
- Klopfenstein v. Union Traction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1921
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Railroad v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.