Groat v. Pracht
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Marion District Court. Action by Groat against Pracht and others, to foreclose a mechanics’ lien. At the November Term, 1882, the defendants recovered a judgment for costs against the plaintiff. He brings the case here. The opinion states the facts.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Brewer, J.:
Plaintiff in error filed his petition in the district court to foreclose a mechanics’ lien on the property of defendants in error. The petition set out the building contract, the statement for a lien as filed, and alleged a balance due of $267.36, for which he prayed for a judgment and a foreclosure of the lien.. The defendants answered, setting up an arbitration, besides other matters. So much of the answer as refers to the arbitration matter is as follows:
“That on or about the 28th of February, 1881, the plaintiff and defendants agreed to…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Miller v. BrumbaughSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
- Cleveland v. ClapMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1809
- Tomlinson v. HammondSupreme Court of Iowa · 1859
- Conger v. DeanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1856
- Armstrong v. MastenNew York Supreme Court · 1814
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Utah Construction Co. v. Western Pacific Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1916
- Coleman Co. v. International UnionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
- Fox, Canfield & Co. v. GravesNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
- Fuller v. WrightSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
- Coleman Co. v. International UnionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957