Roll v. Everett
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On appeal from a decree advised by Vice-Chancellor Pitney, whose opinion is reported in 72 N. J. Fq. (2 Buch.) 20..
1Opinion of the Court
*698The opinion of the court was delivered by
Swayze, J.
This was a bill for partition. The property was conveyed by one Cotheal to Mary Jane Roll and Sarah E. Dey by deed, dated April 16th, 1874, which purported to convey three tracts of land, including the land now in question. The complainants are the successors in title of Mary J. Roll, but it is unnecessary to state in detail the devolution of title to the share claimed by them. Sarah E. Dey’s share was conveyed by the sheriff in 1877 to Ward C. Perrine and Abraham Everett, who subsequently acquired a tax title.
The first difficulty in the case…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Burton v. DriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Turner v. YatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
- Burns v. ByrneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
- Dubois v. CampauMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
- Busch v. HustonIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Breitman v. JaehnalNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1926
- Baird v. MooreNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
- Hyland v. KirkmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
- Lach v. WeberNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1938
- Storm v. HansenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.