Legal Opinion

Lach v. Weber

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided March 5, 1938PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Complainants seek partition of two adjacent parcels of land on Twentieth street in Newark, owned in common by complainants Charles and Emil Lach, and their sister the defendant Mildred Weber, as heirs of their late father. Mrs. Weber, by counter-claim, seeks to bring into the partition a third property, situate on West street in Newark. This piece was owned by the parents of the three children as tenants by the entirety, and upon the death of the elder Mr. Lach in 1915, title passed to his widow. She remarried, and died in 1931 intestate, survived by the three children of her first marriage…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cooper v. ColsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1904
  2. Weaver v. PattersonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1920
  3. Woolston v. PullenNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1917
  4. Roll v. EverettSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1908
  5. Sailer v. SailerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1886

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Shaw & Estes v. Texas Consolidated OilsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
  2. Baird v. MooreNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
  3. Elvins v. SeestedtSupreme Court of Florida · 1940
  4. Boyd v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1957
  5. Hausen v. DahlquistSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API