Legal Opinion

Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 14, 2003PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

President Judge COLINS.

Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA) petitions for review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) that affirmed an order of a Worker’s Compensation Judge (WCJ) that (1) granted Employer SEPTA’s suspension petition in part, (2) denied SEPTA’s termination petition, and (3) granted the reinstatement petition filed by Claimant Jerry Speca (Claimant).

The facts as found by the WCJ are summarized as follows. SEPTA employed Claimant as a transportation manager, or dispatcher. Finding of Fact No. 19. Sometime in 1996 SEPTA…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Figured v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Marx Stationery & Printing Co. v. Redevelopment Authority of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Donohue v. Arrowhead Lake Community Ass'nCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Consolidation Coal Company and East Coast Risk Management v. WCAB (Albani)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API