Legal Opinion

Figured v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 16, 1997No. Nos. 956 and 1166 C.D. 1997PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NARICK, Senior Judge.

The issue before this Court is whether the Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) correctly denied an employer’s termination petition, instead, granting a suspension while denying a claimant’s reinstatement petition.

Eugene Figured (Claimant) and USAir, Inc.1 (USAir) have filed cross-appeals from the order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (WCAB) that affirmed the WCJ’s denial of USAir’s termination petition and granting a suspension, while denying Claimant’s reinstatement petition. We affirm.

Claimant worked as an airline mechanic for over thirty years for USAir until…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Pieper v. Ametek-Thermox Instruments DivisionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Gumro v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Iacono v. Worker's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Giant Eagle, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. At & T v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Maroski v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Armstrong World Industries v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API