Wellstone Partners v. J & M Construction Co.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
GLASSMAN, Justice.
The defendants in these consolidated eases, J & M Construction Co., Inc. (J & M), Judy R. Potter, and Michael L. Rigney, appeal from the judgments of the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Alexander, J.). J & M contends the court erred in denying its demand for a jury trial and in denying recovery on Count III of its cross-claim against the plaintiff, Wellstone Partners (Wellstone), claiming Wellstone had been unjustly enriched. All the defendants contend the court erred in denying their motions to continue the trial of these eases. Finding no error, we affirm the judgments.
I…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- CRY v. CoteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
- Farrell v. TheriaultSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
- Blanchette v. York Mutual InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
- City of Portland v. DePaoloSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1987
- Lucien Bourque, Inc. v. CronkiteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Oviatt v. Automated Entrance System Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Estate of SpearSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997
- Anderson v. O'RourkeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
- Rairdon v. DwyerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
- Schneider v. PutnamSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.