Legal Opinion

Rairdon v. Dwyer

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided May 22, 1991PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McKUSICK, Chief Justice.

The Superior Court (Aroostook County, Pierson, J.) dismissed the appeal of tenants Paul and Gale Dwyer from an adverse judgment in a forcible entry and detainer action brought in the District Court (Houl-ton, Russell, J.) by landlords Clarence and Bonita Rairdon. The Dwyers appeal that dismissal. Finding no error in the Superior Court’s application of 14 M.R.S.A. § 6008 (Supp.1990),1 which required the Dwyers to pay rent into an escrow account in order to stay the issuance of the writ of possession pending appeal, we affirm.

In June 1989 Clarence and Bonita Rair-don…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Harrington v. HarringtonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1970
  2. Tozier v. TozierSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  3. Randall v. KehlorSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1872
  4. Savings & Loan Ass'n of Bangor v. TearSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  5. Wellstone Partners v. J & M Construction Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1990

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Keybank National Ass'n v. SargentSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
  2. Dumont v. Fleet Bank of MaineSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
  3. Foster v. BloombergSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API