Legal Opinion

Lucien Bourque, Inc. v. Cronkite

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided March 30, 1989PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McKUSICK, Chief Justice.

After a trial in the Superior Court (York County; Perkins, J.), the jury returned a special verdict finding defendant Raymond E. Cronkite liable to plaintiff Lucien Bourque, Inc. on a contract claim for excavation and construction work. On that verdict the presiding justice entered judgment against Cronkite for $17,624 remaining due to Bourque on the contract and added $25,-252.57 in interest and attorney fees. The additional amount was based on the justice’s ruling that section 2-207(2) of the Uniform Commercial Code, 11 M.R.S.A. § 2-207(2) (1964), applies to this…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sevigny v. Home Builders Ass'n of Maine, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  2. Farrell v. TheriaultSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
  3. Smith v. Urethane Installations, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sebago, Inc. v. Beazer East, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1998
  2. Lamell Lumber Corp. v. Newstress International, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2007
  3. Lamell Lumber Corp. v. NEWSTRESS INTERN.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2007
  4. Inhabitants of City of Saco v. General Elec. Co.District Court, D. Maine · 1991
  5. Wellstone Partners v. J & M Construction Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API