Lucien Bourque, Inc. v. Cronkite
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
McKUSICK, Chief Justice.
After a trial in the Superior Court (York County; Perkins, J.), the jury returned a special verdict finding defendant Raymond E. Cronkite liable to plaintiff Lucien Bourque, Inc. on a contract claim for excavation and construction work. On that verdict the presiding justice entered judgment against Cronkite for $17,624 remaining due to Bourque on the contract and added $25,-252.57 in interest and attorney fees. The additional amount was based on the justice’s ruling that section 2-207(2) of the Uniform Commercial Code, 11 M.R.S.A. § 2-207(2) (1964), applies to this…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sevigny v. Home Builders Ass'n of Maine, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- Farrell v. TheriaultSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
- Smith v. Urethane Installations, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
3Cited by8 opinions
- Sebago, Inc. v. Beazer East, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1998
- Lamell Lumber Corp. v. Newstress International, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2007
- Lamell Lumber Corp. v. NEWSTRESS INTERN.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2007
- Inhabitants of City of Saco v. General Elec. Co.District Court, D. Maine · 1991
- Wellstone Partners v. J & M Construction Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.