Legal Opinion

Edgar v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 28, 1966No. Civ. 30856PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCOY, J. pro tem. *

Petitioner (applicant) seeks review and annulment of an award of workmen’s compensation. He contends: (1) that he was denied procedural due process because of the referee’s refusal to admit certain evidence; and (2) that the evidence refused, being evidence of medical treatment by physicians furnished by respondents (employer and insurer), compels a finding that applicant was entitled to con- tinning temporary disability benefits rather than the temporary disability benefits from August 11, 1964, through December 20, 1964, and the permanent disability benefits based on a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Allied Compensation Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Ind. Acc. Com.California Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  4. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. Pullman Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hegglin v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Dalen v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  3. Moelleken v. Jones CA2/6California Court of Appeal · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API