Edgar v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
McCOY, J. pro tem. *
Petitioner (applicant) seeks review and annulment of an award of workmen’s compensation. He contends: (1) that he was denied procedural due process because of the referee’s refusal to admit certain evidence; and (2) that the evidence refused, being evidence of medical treatment by physicians furnished by respondents (employer and insurer), compels a finding that applicant was entitled to con- tinning temporary disability benefits rather than the temporary disability benefits from August 11, 1964, through December 20, 1964, and the permanent disability benefits based on a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Allied Compensation Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Ind. Acc. Com.California Court of Appeal · 1964
- Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Pullman Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hegglin v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Dalen v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Moelleken v. Jones CA2/6California Court of Appeal · 2013