Dalen v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SIMS, J.
By petition for writ of review petitioner, an applicant for disability indemnity, contends that respondent board in denying his petition for reconsideration acted without and in excess of its. powers and unreasonably because the findings of fact with regard to the issue of his occupation, rating factors, percentage of his permanent disability, and the date his disability became permanent and stationary are not supported by substantial evidence. He also complains that the appeals board’s decision denying his petition for reconsideration failed to state the evidence upon which…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- LeVesque v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Hegglin v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Evans v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Hines v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Ford Motor Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Amico v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Robinson v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- National Kinney v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Zenith Insurance v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Holt v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986