Bains v. Goldey
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal in Equity from the District Court of Philadelphia. This was an appeal by Joseph Goldey from a decretal order of the court below, sustaining exceptions to his answer to a bill of discovery, in aid of an issue on the law side of the court, wherein George 13. Bains was plaintiff, and the said Joseph Goldey defendant.
Read the full summary
Appeal in Equity from the District Court of Philadelphia. This was an appeal by Joseph Goldey from a decretal order of the court below, sustaining exceptions to his answer to a bill of discovery, in aid of an issue on the law side of the court, wherein George 13. Bains was plaintiff, and the said Joseph Goldey defendant. The facts of the case are fully stated in the following opinion, delivered in the court below, by Sharswood, P. J.:— “ The complainant is the plaintiff in a suit in this court, upon a promissory note, purporting to be made by the defendant, Joseph Goldey, to the order of…
1Per curiam
"We think this case was rightly decided, and that the learned judge of the District Court has sufficiently shown this in his opinion.
Decree affirmed at the costs of the appellant.
2Cited by8 opinions
- Peoples City Bank v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Yorkshire Worsted Mills v. National Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Lesser v. HenrySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
- Compton v. International Harvester Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- Campbell v. Industrial Union of Marine & Shipbuilding Workers, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Delaware County1944
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.