Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Mitchell
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Opinion by
CATHERINE STONE, Justice.
In Continental Casualty Co. v. Downs, the supreme court interpreted the provisions of the Texas Workers’ Compensation Act governing when a workers’ compensation carrier must notify a claimant that the carrier is refusing to pay benefits. 81 S.W.3d 803, 804 (Tex.2002). The Doivns court held “a carrier that fails to begin benefit payments as required by the [Texas Workers’ Compensation] Act or send a notice of refusal to pay within seven days after it receives written notice of injury has not met the statutory requisite to later contest…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Elbaor v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- Lubbock County v. Trammel's Bail BondsTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- Continental Casualty Co. v. DownsTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- Lohec v. Galveston County Commissioner's CourtTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Downs v. Continental Casualty Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2000
3Cited by8 opinions
- Southwestern Bell Telephone Co., LP v. MitchellTexas Supreme Court · 2008
- Southern Insurance Co. v. Brewster, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2007
- Southern Insurance Company v. Michael S. Brewster, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2007
- Southwestern Bell Telephone Co., LP v. MitchellTexas Supreme Court · 2008
- State Office of Risk Management v. Terry Peeples, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.