Legal Opinion

Southwestern Bell Telephone Co., LP v. Mitchell

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 2008No. 05-0171PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hecht

in which Justice WAINWRIGHT, Justice BRISTER, Justice JOHNSON, and Justice WILLETT joined.

In Continental Casualty Co. v. Downs, we construed section 409.021(a) of the Workers’ Compensation Act1 to preclude a carrier from contesting the compensability of an employee’s injury unless, within seven days of receiving notice of injury, it either began to pay benefits or gave written notice of its refusal to do so.2 For more than a decade, the Texas Workers’ Compensation Commission, the entity then charged with carrying out the Act,3 had consistently taken the position that a carrier had sixty days…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Lubbock County v. Trammel's Bail BondsTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Continental Casualty Co. v. DownsTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Marmon v. Mustang Aviation, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Weiner v. WassonTexas Supreme Court · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Marsh USA Inc. v. CookTexas Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Ashley v. HawkinsTexas Supreme Court · 2009
  3. In re J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Joy Worsdale, Individually and as the Personal Representative of the Estate of Scott Worsdale v. the City of Killeen, TexasTexas Supreme Court · 2019
  5. City of San Antonio v. Tenorio ex rel. TenorioTexas Supreme Court · 2018

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API