Legal Opinion

Cordero Anthony Martin v. Duke University, et al.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided May 7, 2026No. 1:26-cv-02820Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CORDERO ANTHONY MARTIN, Case No. 1:26-cv-02820-JLT-CDB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER REQURING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE IN WRITING WHY THIS ACTION 13 v. SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION, FOR LACK 14 DUKE UNIVERSITY, et al., OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION, AND FOR FAILURE TO STATE A 15 Defendants. COGNIZABLE CLAIM 16 (Doc. 1) 17 21-DAY DEADLINE 18 Plaintiff Cordero Anthony Martin (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, initiated this action with 19 the filing of a complaint on April 14, 2026. (Doc. 1).…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  5. Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API