Kienzle v. Selensky
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KAPSNER, Justice.
[¶ 1] Jessica Selensky, formerly known as Jessica Yantzer, appeals from an amended judgment granting Kyle Kien-zle’s motion to change the residence of the parties’ child to North Carolina. We conclude Kienzle has primary physical custody of the child for purposes of deciding this relocation motion, and we affirm the district court’s relocation decision.
I
[¶ 2] Selensky and Kienzle have one child together, and have never been married to each other. In 1998, a stipulated judgment was entered awarding custody of the child:
That the parties agree that they shall share joint custody…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Silbernagel v. SilbernagelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- Dvorak v. DvorakNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Goff v. GoffNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Anderson v. AndersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Maynard v. McNettNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Prchal v. PrchalNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- DUFNER v. TrottierNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- Lund v. LundNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Young v. YoungNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Green v. SwiersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.