Legal Opinion

Young v. Young

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 2008No. 20070293PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROTHERS, Justice.

[¶ 1] James Young appeals the district court’s order amending his visitation rights with his minor daughter. Young disputes several of the district court’s factual findings, argues the new visitation schedule is not in his daughter’s best interests and claims the schedule change is not supported by sufficient evidence. We affirm because the district court’s finding of a material change in circumstances and other findings of fact are not clearly erroneous.

I

[¶ 2] Katherine and James Young were divorced in 2002. Katherine and James received joint legal custody of their…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Reinecke v. GriffethNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Corbett v. CorbettNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Simburger v. SimburgerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Hanson v. HansonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Kienzle v. SelenskyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Prchal v. PrchalNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Eberle v. EberleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Hammeren v. HammerenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Wolt v. WoltNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Lund v. LundNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API