Legal Opinion
Voss v. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided January 3, 1899PublishedCited by 17 opinions
Error to Wayne; Hosmer, J. Assumpsit by Anna Toss and others against the Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance Company on a policy of insurance. From a judgment for defendant on demurrer to the'declaration, plaintiffs bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
This is an action on a life-insurance policy issued by the defendant company to George Engelking, and payable to Katharina Engelking as beneficiary. The declaration recites:
“For that whereas, the'said Anna Toss is the widow *162of George Voss, deceased, and the said other plaintiffs are children and heirs of the said George Voss; and whereas, the said George Voss was in his lifetime one of the two children of Katharina Engelking, deceased; and whereas, the said Katharina Engelking was in her lifetime the wife of George Engelking; and whereas, heretofore, to wit, on the 22d day of December, A. D.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Continental Life Insurance v. PalmerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1875
- Continental Insurance v. H. M. Loud & Sons Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1892
- Lockwood v. Michigan Mutual Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
3Cited by17 opinions
- Millard v. BraytonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
- Bowers Co. v. London Assurance Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Davis v. New York Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Filley v. Illinois Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
- Burnett v. Mutual Life InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.