Legal Opinion
Filley v. Illinois Life Insurance
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided July 7, 1914No. 18,497PublishedCited by 14 opinions
OPINION ON REHEARING. Appeal from Shawnee district court, division No. 1; Alston W. Dana, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Smith, J.:
The former opinion in this case is found in 91 Kan. 220, 137 Pac. 793. On the reargument the appellant vigorously objects to the following statements in the original opinion:
“The instrument in this case . . . has more resemblance to an old-line policy of insurance than to a mutual benefit certificate. . . . While in old-line in*194surance cases the interest of the beneficiary is said to vest at the time of the execution of the policy. . . . The provisions of this policy are more like the provisions of old-line life insurance policies than…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Union Pacific Railroad v. Laramie Stock Yards Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Winfree v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
- United States v. American Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Continental Life Insurance v. PalmerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1875
- Johnson v. Grand Lodge of Ancient OrderSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Neary v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1918
- Gristy v. HudgensArizona Supreme Court · 1922
- Shornick v. ShornickArizona Supreme Court · 1923
- Jenkins v. JenkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Locomotive Engineers Mutual Life & Accident Ass'n v. VandergriffSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.