Legal Opinion

United States v. Field

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided November 19, 1992No. ACM 29843PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

JAMES, Judge:

This case is about the provision of Manual for Courts-Martial (hereinafter MCM), Part IV, paragraph 46e(l) (1984) that doubles the maximum confinement which may be adjudged for larceny when the stolen property is “military property.” Sergeant Field was convicted on his pleas of guilty of larceny of “military property,” namely $39,739.26 from a fund used to pay for “commercial services” supplied to the military. Now, for the first time, he disputes whether the stolen money was “military property.” If it wasn’t, he remains guilty of a larceny, but the sentence…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ellis v. JacobUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  2. United States v. WatsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
  3. United States v. CurtisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
  4. United States v. SchelinUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  5. United States v. ChurchUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. WhiteU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1994
  2. United States v. ZacharyArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2005
  3. United States v. StrodeU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1993
  4. United States v. PabonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1993
  5. United States v. KocurU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API