Legal Opinion

White v. Lorimer's City Dye Works

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 1928No. 4957PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WM. E. LEE, C., J.

It is alleged that the defendants, E. 3L Lorimer and Lorimcr’s City Dye Works, a corporation, issued certain shares of stock in the corporation to plaintiff and certain others, his assignors, on an agreement that the purchasers could return the stock and receive back the price paid, together with interest, at any time they became dissatisfied with the stock. Plaintiff and his assignors, according to the complaint, became dissatisfied, offered to return the stock to the corporation and demanded the amount agreed to be repaid. The defendants refused to accept the stock or to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In re Fechheimer Fisher Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914
  2. Schulte v. Boulevard Gardens Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Porter v. Plymouth Gold Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1904
  4. McIntyre v. E. Bement's SonsMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Olmstead v. Vance & Jones Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1902

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Davies v. Montana Auto Finance Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1930
  2. LA VOY SUPPLY COMPANY v. YoungIdaho Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Grinde v. Dakota Trust & Savings BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Shayne of Miami, Inc. v. Greybow, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1957
  5. Shayne of Miami, Inc. v. Greybow, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API